
What Is Electronic COC?
A clear explanation of Electronic COC and how it helps manufacturers control eCoC readiness, IVI XML, signing and certificate delivery.
KBA IVI 2.0 Transition: Prepare Your eCoC Process for November 2026

KBA's information dated 16 September 2026 sets out an important transition window for IVI 2.x. The test environment is expected during October 2026, live use is planned from 5 November 2026, and the legacy InterIVI-CoC interface is planned to close on 29 November 2026. The exact test-opening day had not yet been stated in the information available for this article.
For manufacturers, the practical task is wider than generating an XML file. Vehicle data, approval context, IVI 2.0 validation, eIDAS signing or sealing, the applicable KBA or NAP route, acknowledgements and correction records all need to work as one controlled process. Dates and operating details remain subject to later KBA updates.
October 2026 is the expected window for the IVI 2.x test environment. Manufacturers should enter that window with representative records, known data owners and signing preparation already in place, so testing can focus on real submission and correction scenarios rather than basic data discovery.
Live use, access for registration authorities and routing through KBA to EUCARIS are planned from 5 November 2026. The legacy InterIVI-CoC interface, which combines CoC and national data, is planned to close on 29 November 2026. Treat these as planning dates and confirm them against KBA's latest technical communication before production activity.
A successful transition starts with source data. VIN, approval number, extension, variant, version and technical values should be mapped to an accountable source and reviewed before the IVI 2.0 record is released. A technically well-formed message can still be wrong when the underlying vehicle or approval context is wrong.
Electronic COC helps manufacturer teams create structured eCoC records, review missing information and run IVI 2.0 validation before the applicable external delivery step. Platform validation improves readiness; it is not a guarantee of KBA, EUCARIS, NAP or registration-authority acceptance.
KBA's information also draws attention to the eIDAS suitability of certificates. Manufacturers should confirm certificate ownership, signing authority, validity, trust chain and operational access before testing. Electronic COC supports signing-readiness and evidence coordination but does not act as a certificate authority, qualified trust service provider or governmental authority.
The applicable KBA or RDW/NAP route depends on manufacturer authorization and authority-specific onboarding. Electronic COC can keep the record, validation state, signature status, delivery response and next action visible in one workflow when the required customer connection is authorized and configured.
A key operational point in KBA's communication is that an IVI 2.x record cannot simply be deleted by KBA after submission. The information is distributed through EUCARIS before storage in the KBA context, so an error must be handled with a correction record.
Testing should therefore include more than a successful first message. Teams should deliberately test an invalid record, interpret the response, correct the source data, issue the appropriate correction and preserve the relationship between the original and replacement evidence.
KBA states that national data should follow the related IVI-CoC record and recommends sending it one day later for a safe operating sequence. This makes correlation, status tracking and retry control essential, especially when production volumes increase.
The waiting period and continuation rules should be confirmed against the latest KBA technical guidance. A manufacturer workflow should show which IVI-CoC record was sent, which response was received, whether the required interval has passed and whether the national-data step is permitted to continue.
Electronic COC brings eCoC record preparation, IVI 2.0 validation, signing-readiness coordination and delivery-response tracking into one manufacturer-side workflow. It supports readiness and controlled operations; authority authorization, legal responsibility and final acceptance remain with the manufacturer and the relevant external parties.
Use the related resource at /germany-kba-ecoc-ivi-xml/, review the platform overview at /platform, or contact Electronic COC at /contact with the process, vehicle category and current blocker your team wants to control first.
KBA's 16 September 2026 information points to October 2026 for the test environment, 5 November 2026 for planned live use, and 29 November 2026 for planned closure of the legacy InterIVI-CoC interface. Check later KBA notices before acting.
KBA's communication says the record cannot simply be deleted; the error should be handled through a correction record. The exact technical process should follow current KBA documentation.
No. Electronic COC supports preparation, validation, signing-readiness and response tracking. Acceptance depends on the applicable authority route, authorization, data and technical rules.
The KBA timetable calls for coordinated preparation of vehicle data, IVI 2.0 validation, eIDAS signing, the authorized delivery route and correction records.
Before production use, confirm the latest KBA technical notices and the manufacturer-specific connection conditions.
Additional answers connecting this article to Electronic COC, certificate tracking and manufacturer rollout decisions.
Define the first preparation scope around your vehicle data, signing route, connection conditions and correction scenarios.
Discuss your workflowReview the IVI 2.0 guide