Electronic COC is built for manufacturer teams that need to turn approved vehicle data into reviewed eCoC records, IVI XML, signing-ready files and clear delivery evidence without relying on scattered spreadsheets or late manual checks.
Electronic Certificates of Conformity depend on a chain of decisions before the final file is released. The team must know which vehicle data is authoritative, which approval reference applies, whether the IVI XML is complete, who reviewed exceptions, which identity will sign, and where the record will be submitted or archived. Electronic COC brings those decisions into one operating view for homologation, compliance, quality and technical teams.
The platform is designed around the practical lifecycle of eCoC preparation rather than isolated document generation.
Start from structured vehicle data and keep the operational record traceable.
Connect approval context and technical references to the record from the beginning.
See missing information, review needs and ownership before release activity starts.
Move records toward IVI 2.0-ready XML preparation without exposing every user to raw structures.
Review gaps and inconsistencies before signing or delivery preparation.
Coordinate eIDAS signing readiness and electronic seal responsibility.
Keep EUCARIS / NAP preparation and archive follow-up visible after release.
The platform focuses on the control points that usually decide whether an eCoC process runs cleanly: source data, approval context, XML readiness, validation, signing, submission preparation and audit evidence.
Keep VIN, vehicle attributes, approval references, variants, versions and certificate status connected in one record.
Prepare structured data for IVI XML while keeping daily review work understandable for non-developer teams.
Identify missing values, stale references and inconsistent records before XML output becomes a release blocker.
Support operational workflows around signing readiness and electronic seal coordination.
Prepare records for EUCARIS / National Access Point contexts, including registration-facing data flows such as RDW / NAP in the Netherlands.
Support operational handling of VECTO-related information and related vehicle data preparation workflows.
Connect internal systems after the source-of-truth model and review responsibilities are clear.
Track previous-stage references, inherited values, final-stage changes and responsibility across body-built vehicles.
Improve coordination between homologation, compliance and operational stakeholders.
Start with one vehicle category, one team or one release process and expand after the workflow is proven.
Most eCoC errors are easier to prevent upstream than to correct after signing or submission. The platform makes missing data, ownership gaps and version issues visible earlier.
Check whether required operational information is present before output preparation.
Identify mismatches and review needs earlier in the preparation lifecycle.
Improve operational readiness and process visibility across eCoC workflows.
Make next actions clearer across homologation, compliance and operational teams.
Signing and submission should not be treated as isolated final clicks. Before release, the team needs reviewed data, a clear signing responsibility, the right seal or trust-service path, and evidence showing which record version was approved for delivery.
A reliable eCoC process depends on knowing where each value comes from. Some values belong to type approval documentation, some to production systems, some to ERP, and some to previous-stage vehicle data.
Electronic COC keeps the certificate record tied to those sources so teams can review data before XML generation, signing or submission pressure starts.
EUCARIS / NAP, UK VCA and future KBA-oriented workflows do not all follow the same operating route. A manufacturer may need portal-based work, API-connected submission, or a staged rollout that proves data quality first.
The platform keeps XML readiness, signing preparation, delivery evidence and archive follow-up in the same process view.
Homologation, compliance, quality, production and technical users usually look at the same certificate from different angles. Without shared status, teams spend time reconstructing what changed and who approved it.
Electronic COC turns review, correction, signing and delivery preparation into visible work instead of side conversations.
No. Electronic COC is designed for manufacturers and operational teams managing repeatable eCoC workflows.
No. The platform is designed for operational and homologation workflows while still supporting IVI 2.0 XML readiness.
Yes. Manufacturers can begin with a limited operational scope and expand workflows gradually.
Yes. Electronic COC is structured around IVI 2.0-ready operational workflows.
Yes. The platform supports operational preparation workflows for multi-stage vehicle environments.
Electronic COC is designed to support ERP and API integration workflows where operationally required.
Discuss your operational workflow, current readiness level and eCoC preparation requirements with our team.
Request a DemoContact Us