eCoC software for vehicle manufacturers
Manage vehicle data, IVI 2.0 XML validation, signing and submission preparation in one eCoC workflow. Explore the platform and request a manufacturer demo.
Software selection for automotive teams
Electronic Certificate of Conformity software connects the vehicle’s approved technical data with the certificate issued for that vehicle. For automotive teams, the selection question is how the software manages the complete record: source data, IVI XML, review, signing and the delivery outcome.
A document editor, an XML validator and a manufacturer platform solve different parts of the work. Begin with the tasks your team must carry out every production day. Electronic COC is designed around manufacturer certificate workflows, with IVI 2.0 preparation and coordinated validation, signing and release activities.
Ask each provider to work through the same sanitised example. A list of supported terms does not show whether a reviewer can resolve a missing value or understand which record was released. Use the questions below to make the demonstration useful to both your operational and integration teams.
Confirm the source-system connection, XML profile, signing arrangement and receiving route separately. A software demonstration is not evidence of a live authority connection. Ask for the exact test environment, account ownership, accepted sample and remaining activation steps for your project. This makes the commercial scope easier to compare and prevents assumptions becoming production dependencies.
The scope depends on the number of issuing entities, vehicle categories, data sources, integrations and review steps. Include training, migration, exception handling and support expectations in the discussion. Start with a defined pilot and an acceptance checklist, then decide which workflows to add next.
A readable document and a structured data submission are different outputs. Establish which output the destination requires, how it is generated from the vehicle record and which version is signed or submitted.
XML validation checks the data against specified rules. The manufacturer still needs to confirm the technical content and approval context, and the receiving authority controls acceptance of a submission.
Compare the same implementation scope: issuing entities, vehicle categories, volume, data connections, signing services, delivery routes and support. Request a scoped proposal after a representative workflow has been reviewed.
Reviewed . Requirements are defined by the linked authorities and service documentation.
Technical guidance for the IVI 2.0 data structure. Use the receiving authority’s applicable schema and instructions for your submission.
Background on Initial Vehicle Information and the National Access Point model.
Manage vehicle data, IVI 2.0 XML validation, signing and submission preparation in one eCoC workflow. Explore the platform and request a manufacturer demo.
Plan IVI 2.0 XML validation around schema checks, vehicle data review and release decisions. Identify what must be corrected before signing and submission.
Connect eCoC XML signing to the reviewed vehicle record. Scope certificate ownership, signing API handovers, validation and submission evidence.
Share the systems, teams and vehicle categories involved. We can work through a representative workflow and clarify the implementation scope.
Request a workflow demo